Hungarian Historical Phonology ásít
ásít 'yawn'
First attestation/Old Hungarian data
[coming]
Important dialectal forms
[coming]
Uralic/Ugric/Pre-Hungarian reconstruction
Disputed:
UEW: * ȣćɜ- 'yawn; gähnen'
Status of the Ugric etymology
Uncertain
Loan etymology
None suggested
Cognates suggested in earlier research
MSzFE, UEW:
Khanty: East (V) usi̮l-, South (DN) wăses-, North (O) os- 'gähnen'
Mansi: South (TJ) ōsə·nt-, East (KU) ūsənt-, West (P) ūsəntāl-, North (So) ūsint- 'gähnen'
Mari: ušte- 'gähnen', (U) ušte- 'die Verstorbenen anbeten und mit Opfer verehren, eine Gedächtnisfeier für die Gestorbenen abhalten'
Commentary
UEW lists this etymology as a certain Finno-Ugric etymology, but from the reconstruction it is visible that the issue is not quite settled. The Finno-Ugric origin of Hungarian ásít has been doubted by TESz and EWUng, who rather assume an onomatopoetic origin; already MSzFE mentioned the possibility that the alleged cognates can be independent onomatopoetic formations. Abondolo (1996: 101) lists the Finno-Ugric etymology without comments, and the comparison of the Hungarian, Khanty and Mansi words is also mentioned by DEWOS (190).
Bereczki (2013: 292-293, s.v. ueštam) rejects the comparison with Mari uštem, noting that ueštem is the original form and uštam is due to contraction. He also notes that ušte- 'die Verstorbenen anbeten und mit Opfer verehren, eine Gedächtnisfeier für die Gestorbenen abhalten' is a completely different and unrelated word.
The issue with the alleged Khanty and Mansi cognates of ásít is likewise problematic. The relation Hu s ~ Kh, Ms s is irregular, and the relationship between the forms in the Khanty variaties is also irregular.
Because of these problems, the idea that ásít is of Uralic origin should be rejected.
Conclusion
The Uralic etymology of ásít is unconvincing. Further research is needed.
References
Abondolo 1991: 101: PFU
DEWOS: 190: Hu ~ Kh ~ Ms
EWUng s.v. ásít
MSzFE: 97-98, s.v. ásít: ? PFU
TESz s.v. ásít
UEW s.v. ȣćɜ-: PFU Uralonet